Memcached, Speaking of Performance...
« previous entry | next entry »
May. 13th, 2009 | 03:40 pm
I've been looking at the cost recently of fetches for libmemcached, and seeing if there was anything I could do to increase performance.
What did I find? Half the cost currently is in the snprintf() sitting at the protocol sender.
Half!
Good news about this?
If you are using the new binary protocol with Memcached this goes away completely :)
snprintf() sucks.
What did I find? Half the cost currently is in the snprintf() sitting at the protocol sender.
Half!
Good news about this?
If you are using the new binary protocol with Memcached this goes away completely :)
snprintf() sucks.
(no subject)
from:
crucially
date: May. 14th, 2009 06:04 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
(no subject)
from:
krow
date: May. 14th, 2009 06:15 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Think of *printf() as a mini language
from:
illiterat
date: May. 15th, 2009 05:40 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
Re: Think of *printf() as a mini language
from:
krow
date: May. 15th, 2009 05:42 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread